HeyGen cinematic avatar API: 3 looks per shot vs Sume's one
HeyGen cinematic_avatar takes a prompt and 1-3 avatar looks with no script. Sume Avatar Video resolves one avatar per final video from a script.
HeyGen's cinematic avatar API is POST /v3/videos with type: "cinematic_avatar": a prompt of 1 to 10,000 characters plus an array of 1 to 3 avatar look ids, with no script or voice. Sume's Avatar Video works differently: it is script-driven and the docs say current execution supports one resolved avatar per final video.
What does the HeyGen cinematic avatar request take?
Per the HeyGen page read 2026-10-01, prompt is the creative brief for the shot, avatar_id is an array of 1 to 3 look ids so more than one avatar can feature in the same shot, and optional references steer style or motion. Looks and references share a budget of at most 3 videos and 9 images. The example sets aspect_ratio, resolution and duration.
What does Sume Avatar Video take instead?
Requests to POST /v1/avatar-1.0/talking-video provide exactly one of script or video_inputs, plus a ready avatar by avatar_handle. Scene direction goes in scene: { "type": "prompt", "prompt": "..." }. The docs state: "Current execution supports one resolved avatar per final video and expects scene backgrounds to resolve to one shared scene." See Generate avatar video.
How do the two compare?
| Input | HeyGen cinematic_avatar | Sume Avatar Video |
|---|---|---|
| Driver | prompt (1-10,000 chars) | script or video_inputs |
| Avatars per request | 1 to 3 looks | One resolved avatar per final video |
| Voice | None needed | Spoken scenes use type: "text" |
| Scene direction | In the prompt | scene prompt or photo |
How do I get two characters in one Sume video?
Not in one avatar video. Render each speaker as its own job and join the results; two-host podcast with one avatar per video shows the split.
Sources
Related posts
More in Models
- Genjutsu Restyle's 20+ styles vs Sume motion transfer inputs
Higgsfield Genjutsu Restyle picks from 20+ styles in its app. Sume's motion transfer takes a source video plus 1 to 8 reference images, with no style list.
- Ideogram 4 custom_model_uri vs Sume catalog ids and sume/auto
Ideogram's custom-model endpoint picks a private model by custom_model_uri. Sume has no such field: you choose a catalog id or sume/auto. What to send instead.
- Ideogram 8K output resolution API vs Sume 512 to 4K tiers
Ideogram 4.0 takes output_resolution 1k, 2k, 4k or 8k as a pixel budget. Sume's image route takes a normalized 512, 1K, 2K or 4K tier.
- Ideogram Z-Image resolution rules vs Sume image_size
Ideogram Z-Image takes WIDTHxHEIGHT, sides in multiples of 16, area up to 1,048,576 px. Sume uses 512/1K/2K/4K tiers and GPT Image 2.5 custom pixels.
Written by Sume