Same vendor, two Seedance 2.5 prices: $0.0738/s vs $0.231 at 720p
Two Higgsfield pages list Seedance 2.5 at different rates: $0.0738 a second on one, $0.231 at 720p on another. How to read a vendor-authored price table.

Two pages from the same vendor, Higgsfield, show different Seedance 2.5 prices. The API blog lists Seedance 2.5 at $0.0738 per second, and the video API comparison, described there as verified in September 2026, lists it at $0.231 at 720p. The second figure is about 3.1 times the first, and neither page, as read, explains the gap.
What each page lists
The comparison page is vendor-authored, so treat rival prices on it as unverified. One row can be checked against a primary source: Google's pricing page lists Veo 3.1 Standard at $0.40 per second, and the comparison lists the same figure.
| Model | API blog | Comparison page |
|---|---|---|
| Seedance 2.5 | $0.0738 per second | $0.231 at 720p |
| Veo 3.1 Standard | not listed | $0.40 per second |
| Runway Gen-4.5 | not listed | $0.12 per second |
| Luma Ray 3.2 | not listed | $0.09 per second |
| MiniMax H3 | not listed | $0.08 per second |
Why a gap like this appears
Plausible reasons for a gap include different units, resolutions, audio settings, or a plan-dependent rate, but the pages do not say. Do not pick the lower number for a budget on a guess. Ask the vendor for the rate that applies to your exact request, or run one paid request and read what you were charged.
Normalize before comparing
Units differ across vendors too. The Sume docs show an example catalog row priced per 1,000 video tokens for seedance-2, and the video docs say the billable amount is provider list times 1.25, reported as usage.cost on the poll response. Normalize every quote to cost per finished second before comparing, as in the stored post on normalizing per second and per token.
What the gap costs at scale
Take a 30 second clip. At $0.0738 per second it costs about $2.21. At $0.231 per second it costs about $6.93. For 100 clips that is $221 against $693, a difference of $472 from a number that no page explained.
The arithmetic is the reason to settle the question with one paid request before you commit a budget. A gap of this size would change a vendor choice, and it can sit unnoticed in a spreadsheet because each figure looks reasonable on its own page.
- 30 seconds at $0.0738: about $2.21.
- 30 seconds at $0.231: about $6.93.
- 100 clips: $221 against $693.
- Settle it with one paid pilot request.
A routine for any price table
A short routine keeps comparisons honest. Do it once per vendor, and date the result.
- Find a row you can check against the model owner's own page.
- Write down the resolution, duration, and audio setting for every number.
- Convert tokens, credits, and per-clip prices to dollars per second.
- Run one real request and compare the invoice to the table.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Seed Audio 1.0 per minute: Luma 66 credits vs Runway 15, in dollars
Luma lists Seed Audio 1.0 at 66 credits a minute and Runway at 15: $0.11 to $0.20 a minute on Luma and $0.12 to $0.36 on Runway, depending on plan.
- Seedance 2.0, Fast, Mini and 2.5: 5-second 720p clip price on Sume
A 5-second 720p Seedance clip is $0.945 on Mini, $1.512 on Fast, $1.89 on 2.0 and $2.889 on 2.5 at Sume rates. The token arithmetic behind each number.
- Seedance 2.5, 2.0 and Mini on Luma: credits a second in dollars
Luma lists Seedance 2.5 at 36, 78 and 191 credits a second, 2.0 at 24, 51 and 126, and Mini at 12 and 26. Sume runs about 2.2 to 2.5 times Plus.
- Is a 9:16 Seedance clip cheaper than 16:9? Pixel math on Sume
On Sume, 9:16, 16:9 and 1:1 Seedance 2.5 clips cost the same at 720p because the token count is identical. 4:3 and 21:9 cost slightly more.
Written by Sume