Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0 on Sume: same 12.5 cents a second, what differs

At 720p, Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 and Wan 3.0 both cost $0.125 a second on Sume, so price does not separate them and the catalog fields do. Omni Flash runs 3 to 10 seconds in 16:9 or 9:16 with native audio always on and reaches 4K. Wan 3.0 runs 2 to 30 seconds, takes more aspect ratios, and accepts reference images, videos and audio.

Same price at 720p, different elsewhere

Sume sells at provider list times 1.25, rounded up to the cent per job. List is $0.10 a second for both at 720p. At the other resolutions the two diverge: Omni Flash is $0.0375 at 360p, $0.1875 at 1080p and $0.375 at 4K, while Wan 3.0 is $0.0625 at 480p and $0.25 at 1080p, with no 4K row.

Side by side

Prices are per second on Sume as read from the video-router catalog.

Picking between them

For a short vertical or landscape ad that needs sound, Omni Flash at 8 seconds costs $1.00 at 720p and includes audio. For a 20-second spot, or one that must match a product shot through reference images, Wan 3.0 at $2.50 for 20 seconds is the only one of the two that can produce it in a single job.

At 1080p Omni Flash is a quarter cheaper than Wan. At 4K only Omni Flash is available.

A 10-second clip is the longest Omni Flash job and costs $1.25 at 720p, the same as a 10-second Wan clip. The crossover is at 11 seconds, where only Wan can generate a single job.

If you want sound without a separate audio step, Omni Flash includes it. Wan 3.0 lists reference audio as an input, which is a different workflow: you supply the track as a reference.

Resolution matters more than model at 1080p: for ten 8-second clips, Omni Flash is $15.00 and Wan is $20.00 on Sume.

• Omni Flash cannot do 1:1 or 4:3; Wan can.
• A 30-second Wan clip is $3.75 at 720p; the same length on Omni Flash is three jobs.
• Both accept reference inputs, but Omni Flash takes fewer videos and no audio.