Gladia Starter $0.61 per hour vs Sume STT $0.60 per hour
Gladia Starter prices async transcription at $0.61 an hour with 50 euros of free credit. Sume STT works out to $0.60 an hour. What differs besides the price.

Gladia's pricing page lists its Starter plan at $0.61 per hour for asynchronous transcription and $0.75 per hour for real-time, with 50 euros of free credits. Sume STT 1.0 is $0.01 per audio minute, which is $0.60 per hour. At list price the two are within a cent of each other, so the choice is about the shape of the product, not the rate.
Gladia also lists a Growth tier as low as $0.20 per hour async, so the Starter number is not its floor.
Side by side
All Gladia figures are from its own pricing page, read on 2026-10-02.
| Item | Gladia | Sume STT 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Async, entry tier | $0.61 per hour (Starter) | $0.60 per hour ($0.01 per minute) |
| Real-time | $0.75 per hour (Starter) | Not offered |
| Lower tier | As low as $0.20 per hour async (Growth) | Single public rate |
| Free credit | 50 euros on the page | See your balance; no free-credit claim here |
| Concurrency on entry tier | 30 real-time and 25 async | See Sume rate limits |
What you get from Sume
Sume STT takes a public HTTPS audio_url, an optional language_code, and a duration_seconds hint of 1 to 600. It returns text and word-level words[] with start and end times, and a sentence segmentation mode that returns caption-line shaped segments.
The same API key also runs captions, timeline audio and music, so a transcript can feed POST /v1/video-captions as words without another vendor.
import os, requests
r = requests.post(
"https://api.sume.com/v1/stt-1.0/transcribe",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['SUME_API_KEY']}",
"Idempotency-Key": "stt-demo-001"},
json={"audio_url": "https://example.com/call.mp3",
"language_code": "en",
"duration_seconds": 300},
)
print(r.status_code, r.json())Where Gladia is the better fit
If you need real-time streaming transcription, Sume does not offer it today; Gladia lists it. If your volume qualifies for a lower tier, Gladia's published floor is well under Sume's single rate.
If your workload is batch files inside a media pipeline, Sume's parity price plus the shared job model is the reason to stay put.
Worked example
Compare a month of calls. The figures use Gladia's Starter async rate and Sume's per-minute rate, nothing else.
- 100 hours: Gladia Starter $61.00, Sume STT $60.00.
- 1,000 hours: Gladia $610.00, Sume $600.00.
- Gladia's Growth tier, listed as low as $0.20 per hour, would be $200.00 for 1,000 hours if you qualify.
Checklist before you commit
Because the entry-tier prices are this close, concurrency and the surrounding workflow decide it. Gladia's page lists 25 concurrent async jobs on Starter; Sume's limits are described in its docs and by your workspace.
- Ask whether you need real-time: only Gladia lists it.
- Test a call with two speakers on each service and check how the output names them.
- Confirm your language is covered; Gladia's page lists 100+ languages.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Google Chirp 3 Instant Custom Voice: 10 s consent, allowlist only
Google's Chirp 3 Instant Custom Voice is allowlisted, wants a 10-second consent clip, and keeps the cloning key on your side. How that compares to a Sume clone.
- Flow charges 7 to 15 credits for Omni Flash; Sume bills dollars
Google Flow prices Gemini Omni Flash 720p at 7 to 15 credits by length. Sume bills the same model per second in dollars; clip costs from 3 to 10 seconds.
- Flow video edit costs 40 credits a try; Sume bills per second
Flow charges 40 credits per Gemini Omni video edit. Sume's video_url edit bills output seconds: $0.625 for 5 seconds, $1.25 for 10 at 720p.
- Google's GenMedia video editor skill vs Sume trim, filter and Timeline
Google's open GenMedia video editor skill pairs Veo 3.1 with ffmpeg steps. Which of its steps map to Sume's trim, filter and Timeline jobs, and which do not.
Written by Sume