Four Sume image rows between 3.75 and 5 cents: Flux, Seedream, Recraft
Flux 2 Pro $0.0375, Seedream 5.0 Lite $0.04375, Seedream 4.5 and Recraft V4 $0.05. Compare ratios, references and formats before you choose on price alone.

Four Sume image rows bill between 3.75 and 5 cents: Flux 2 Pro at $0.0375, Seedream 5.0 Lite at $0.04375, and Seedream 4.5 and Recraft V4 at $0.05 each. A hundred images cost $3.75, $4.375, $5.00 and $5.00. Within that 1.25-cent band the choice is set by what the request needs. Flux 2 Pro and Recraft V4 list 13 aspect ratios, including 21:9. Both Seedream rows list nine. Recraft V4 takes no references and returns only webp.
Facts are from the Sume catalog on origin/main, read 2026-10-08. The catalog does not rank picture quality, and this post does not either.
The grid
All four take n from 1 to 4. None lists resolution or quality.
| Field | Flux 2 Pro | Seedream 5.0 Lite | Seedream 4.5 | Recraft V4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billed per image | $0.0375 | $0.04375 | $0.05 | $0.05 |
| 100 images | $3.75 | $4.375 | $5.00 | $5.00 |
| Reference images | Up to 10 | Up to 10 | Up to 10 | None |
| Aspect ratios | 13 | 9 | 9 | 13 |
| 21:9 and 9:21 | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| 4:5 and 5:4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Output formats | png, jpeg, webp | png, jpeg, webp | png, jpeg, webp | webp only |
Rules of thumb from the grid
If you need a 21:9 header with a source photo, Flux 2 Pro is the only one of the four that does both and it is also the cheapest. If you need a text-only illustration in 21:9, Recraft V4 is available at 1.25 cents more, with webp as the only output.
If you need png or jpeg out, Recraft V4 is out. If you need a reference photo, Recraft V4 is out. The two Seedream rows are interchangeable on the contract, so the only difference is 0.625 cents per image.
Check before you commit
Read GET /v1/images/models/{id}/endpoints for the row you plan to use. It returns the definitive parameter set and the billed cost_usd. A parameter the row does not list returns 400 unsupported_parameter, so a shared request body that works on one of the four may fail on another; keep one request builder per model id.
When two rows look equal on the contract, run a blind comparison. Generate the same eight prompts on each, shuffle the files, and have two people pick the ones they would publish. At these prices the whole test for all four rows is about $1.45 for one image per prompt per row, which is cheaper than a wrong default.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Video ad codec table: H.264 everywhere, H.265 only on Pinterest
Which video codec each ad platform accepts, from the vendor pages, and which Sume trim setting keeps or rewrites the codec of your source file.
- Which free plans refill: Synthesia, ElevenLabs, Suno, Runway, Descript
Synthesia Basic gives 500 credits a month, ElevenLabs Free 10,000, Suno 50 a day. Runway Free (125) and Descript Free AI credits (100) are one-time.
- Griffin-Lite 10 ms audio packets vs Sume's 4 second minimum clip
Two ends of avatar timing: Tavus Griffin-Lite streams audio in packets as small as 10 ms; Sume Avatar 1.0 plans clips of 4 to 12 seconds. What each fits.
- Griffin-Lite inputs vs a Sume talking-video request, side by side
Tavus describes a reference image plus streaming audio and controls; Sume takes an avatar handle, a script and a tier. The two request shapes compared.
Written by Sume